About Craig Mayberry

While writing his articles from 2008 to 2011, Craig lived near Lynden and taught at both Whatcom Community College and Western Washington University. He was active in politics and ran for public office on a couple of occasions.

By: Craig Mayberry (53)

We’re Screwed

Overview of federal spending and revenue

Overview of federal spending and revenue

By
• Topics:

For all the debate over spending and revenue, a few convenient facts seem to be ignored by most politicians and media.  A simple graph shows the fundamental problem.  Below the $0 on the upper graph is total federal spending by major category.  You see a fairly dramatic and consistent increase in spending through 2016.  The big problem is on the revenue side.  You will notice a slight dip over the last few years as revenue peaked in 2008 and declined, as expected during the recession.  The problem is the projection of revenues over the next few years.  Does anyone really believe that revenue is going to increase by an average of 12% a year for the next 5 years?  These revenue numbers assume the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and any additional tax increases passed as part of Obamacare, which in principle could increase tax revenue. But that much?  We have been running trillion dollar+ deficits for a couple of years and the only reason those are forecast to go away is because of overly optimistic revenue increases.  The fact is, revenue is not going to increase nearly that much because the economy is not recovering, and likely will not recover any time in the near future.  Bottom line is, we will continue to run trillion dollar deficits for at least the next five years, taking our national debt from $14.3 trillion to upward of $20 trillion by 2016.  Does anyone really believe that kind of debt is sustainable?  If we are talking about a debt downgrade at $14.3 trillion, what sort of credit rating will we have at $20 trillion in a couple of years?   

Congress is set to vote on a token spending reduction package so the debt level can increase. Baseline spending may get cut, but not anything significant that will slow down government spending.  There are no real spending or budgeting reforms as part of the package.  Somehow Washington DC thinks it continues to be business as usual and if they patch a few minor problems everything will work out. Bottom line: we are screwed and Congress and President Obama could care less. They continue to put their own political fortunes above that of the nation. Instead of fixing the problem now they kicked it down the road--where it will be even more difficult to fix.    

About Craig Mayberry

Closed Account • Member since Jan 17, 2008

While writing his articles from 2008 to 2011, Craig lived near Lynden and taught at both Whatcom Community College and Western Washington University. He was active in politics and ran for public [...]

Tip Johnson

Aug 01, 2011

Craig,

What kind of budget reforms do you advocate?  And id it really Obama’s fault that revenues are not increased?  Wasn’t it the Republicans who categorically refused to raise any taxes?

Read More...

Craig Mayberry

Aug 01, 2011

Tip,

One of my points is that revenues have to increase by 12% just to meet the current projections.  Taxes are going up even if they were not passed specifically in this legislation.  As of today the Bush tax cuts are expiring for everyone so if the decision is made to keep them on everyone that earns less than $250,000 then the deficit gets even worse than it is right now.  You also have tax increases from Obamacare baked into the numbers, how much more do we need to raise taxes.  You cannot tax your way out of this, period.  Fine, tax the rich a couple of more percent on top of the increase they will see next year when the Bush tax cuts expire, it will not even make a dent.  Frankly, you could not double the taxes on the rich and it would help close the gap that much.

What would I do.  The first fundamental problem is the baseline budgeting process that is used.  The baseline budget increase every year to the tune of 6% or so if Congress does nothing and then anything that is done is called a cut (when in fact as we could define cut it is not really a cut).  This would be a little like your employer coming to you and saying that your income for 2011 is going to go from $50,000 to $60,000 and then coming back a little while later and saying I can only pay you $55,000 this year and then you whining and crying that your budget has been cut by $5,000.  Only in Washington (and Olympia) can a $5,000 increase be called a cut.  The process itself is dysfunctional.  The first step would be to eliminate baseline budgeting and going to a zero based budget.  The second thing is we spend too much money to begin with.  It is completely bogus that every time anyone talks about reducing spending that the democrats start whining that the poor and senior citizens will be hurt.  The government is bloated and inefficient and you could provide the same level of service at 80% of the cost if they would just think about it a little bit and do some major restructuring.

Read More...

Rob Stratton

Aug 02, 2011

Vote Ron Paul. He has voted no consistently against both pseudo parties. Why? Oh because he long foresaw this happening and actually checks if a law is constitutional. Something the majority of those in “power” do anymore.

We need to end the Fed, go back to a monetary system based on something real, we need to drastically reduce our military budget, and that spent on welfare programs (I include all the foreign aid we give federally to other countries). We need to repeal the 16 and17th amendments. Stop Federal bribing of States, states need to learn to float or sink on their own.

Read More...

Rob Stratton

Aug 02, 2011

Edit: I meant to say “those in power rarely do anymore”.

Is there a way to see this whole text box? It hampers my already poor editing process. 😊

Read More...

Hue Beattie

Aug 02, 2011

Florida will seem to sink as sea level rises.

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register

We’re Screwed

By Craig MayberryOn Aug 01, 2011

Overview of federal spending and revenue

5 comments, most recent 13 years ago

The Cost of Local Food

By Craig MayberryOn Mar 10, 2011

Why local food costs more

5 comments, most recent 13 years ago

Question on Violence

By Craig MayberryOn Jan 11, 2011

Violence

8 comments, most recent 13 years ago

Power and Politics

By Craig MayberryOn Jan 10, 2011

Power and politics

5 comments, most recent 14 years ago

Michelle’s Wrong, Sarah’s Right

By Craig MayberryOn Dec 19, 2010

Local Food

2 comments, most recent 13 years ago

Craig Mayberry Announces Candidacy for the 42nd District State House, Position 1

By Craig MayberryOn May 05, 2010

Craig Mayberry announces he is running for the State Legislature.

2 comments, most recent 14 years ago

Financing Elections

By Craig MayberryOn May 01, 2010

It is time to restore integrity to the political process and it must begin with the process of running for office.

2 comments, most recent 14 years ago

Questions on Health Care

By Craig MayberryOn Mar 27, 2010

Some questions on health care reform to our Congressional delegation.

Intraprising Government

By Craig MayberryOn Mar 05, 2010

A novel approach to government monoplies

Where Have We Been- Where Are We Going?

By Craig MayberryOn Feb 15, 2010

People and businesses have had to make changes in what they do, when will government do the same?

1 comment, most recent 14 years ago

Political Ethics

By Craig MayberryOn Jan 16, 2010

Contrasts business ethics and political ethics

4 comments, most recent 14 years ago

WA State Government Spending

By Craig MayberryOn Dec 15, 2009

It is always fascinating to watch the government budgeting process. With the recent reduction in revenue forecast, the Governor and other state politicians announced a severe cut in funding to

Real Health Care Reform

By Craig MayberryOn Nov 27, 2009

This is a reprint of one of my earlier posts on health care. The issue is more timely now and I thought I would re-enter it into the discussion. The current health care bills before the House

4 comments, most recent 15 years ago

Restructuring Washington

By Craig MayberryOn Oct 29, 2009

At the Bellingham City Club on Wednesday, Norman Rice, the former mayor of Seattle, spoke about public process. It was an enlightening conversation for all that were in the room, as a politici

2 comments, most recent 15 years ago

What is a hit piece?

By Craig MayberryOn Oct 29, 2009

There is a lot of discussion about this time every year on hit pieces and negative campaigning. So now I have to ask the question: What is the definition of a hit piece? Part of the problem is ever

14 comments, most recent 15 years ago

Changing the Power Structure

By Craig MayberryOn Sep 23, 2009

One of the underlying currents of the recent discussions around health care is the role of the federal government. I thought it would be interesting to see how much is spent per person by our

3 comments, most recent 15 years ago

Food Safety Czar

By Craig MayberryOn Sep 15, 2009

Much has been made of czars in the current administration; however, one czar in particular should have people from both political sides a little nervous. In a case of sheer duplicity, the firs

4 comments, most recent 15 years ago

It Comes Down to People

By Craig MayberryOn Sep 14, 2009

I have mentioned there is little difference between government and big business; both are run by bureaucracies not known to be customer friendly. This issue is important on two fronts we are c

3 comments, most recent 15 years ago

Implementing Farm Plans

By Craig MayberryOn Aug 28, 2009

With passage of the Critical Areas Ordinance a few years ago, one of the requirements for small livestock owners in Whatcom County was the development of a farm plan to help mitigate impacts on

9 comments, most recent 15 years ago

The Future of Health Care Reform

By Craig MayberryOn Aug 19, 2009

There is an increasingly wide divide in the health care debate that at its source comes down to a fundamental disconnect between the opposing sides. While the Democrats are trying to explain w

4 comments, most recent 15 years ago