Topic: Bellingham (1129)

Corporate Welfare at its Worst …and About to Get Worse

From Musk’s big investment all the way to local campaigns, political “contributions” will be re-paid. Here’s how.

From Musk’s big investment all the way to local campaigns, political “contributions” will be re-paid. Here’s how.

By

As we all know, Trump is preparing to re-enter office. What we may not realize is that with Trump’s elevation of Republican Corporatist Brendan Carr to the chair of the FCC, Trump is getting ready to pay Elon Musk back for his campaign contributions. So heads up: Trump and Carr plan to back the worst broadband solution possible for the poor and middle class: Starlink.

Starlink is NOT the answer:

This is coming at a time when the general population’s understanding of how broadband connections work is at an all time low, along with most other education. Remember when they told us that we didn’t need fiber, that 5G would work? But then it didn’t come close to living up to expectations? Well, get ready, because they are about to make the same false claim about Starlink. 

Several years ago, I wrote an article called “Starlink is No Star.”  Turns out, I was right. Those wireless and satellite solutions that they “offered” at the highest prices possible, and were “given” to the poorest among us, turned out to be virtually worthless when compared to fiber. Then, to add insult to injury, and remember this was during the pandemic, once the charitable funding for these connections ran out, the poor couldn’t possibly afford them and lost their internet. But I guess that was ok, it didn’t work well anyway.

 That was the reason the Biden administration initially refused to give Starlink $855.5 million in rural broadband funding years ago.  They knew it was not a real solution, especially for the poor. They also knew that Starlink, a $42 billion dollar company, did not need corporate welfare. Did the Biden administration screw up on broadband in other ways? Yes, unforgivably so.

Biden didn’t learn from the previous administrations that had pumped money into big telecom only to have it disappear, WITHOUT giving us the critical infrastructure upgrades they promised and we needed. We’ve given billions to private companies and always end up with inferior products providing inferior service. Private companies consistently install the bare minimum, charge the highest price for it based on a made up metrics, and pocket the profit. This is why we’ve consistently paid the highest prices for internet service in the developed world.

Starlink’s biggest problem, like all wireless, is that it is an EXTENSION of fiber, NOT a replacement for it. But you know this from the book “Fiber” by Susan Crawford. In some situations, Starlink can send signals in space from satellite to satellite, but even Musk himself has admitted that he needs more fiber on the ground to make Starlink work correctly years ago in Fierce Wireless. He calls Starlink a “nice compliment to fiber.

The best quote I found was pulled together by the Google AI from several sources commenting on the need for fiber even with Starlink, “While Starlink can function independently, it essentially relies on fiber-optic networks to deliver its best performance, as the data from Starlink satellites must ultimately connect to the internet through existing fiber infrastructure, meaning that the quality of your Starlink connection is heavily influenced by the quality of the fiber network it connects to; therefore, if you want the best possible Starlink experience, having access to a robust fiber network is crucial.” So, Starlink is an inferior product when compared with fiber-to-the-premises which is confirmed in this article and many others as well. 

Let’s compare pricing: 

These numbers are for fiber on a public network, below are numbers for Starlink.

Public Network in Chatanooga, TN:

300 Mbit (80 Mbits faster than Starlink’s “best” plan) = $58/month

Gigabit (1,000 Mbits) = $68/month

2.5 Gigs (2,500 Mbits) = $98/month

10 Gigs (10,000 Mbits) = $300/month

Note: This public network has NO MONTHLY DATA CAPS OR OVERAGES, UNLIKE COMCAST, STARLINK, etc.

Starlink is less reliable than fiber in most cases, and has a 50 GB data-cap before “overage” fees are charged, so all pricing should be considered “at least.” Starlink also applies upfront equipment costs, ranging from $350 to $5,000. Many plans have limited coverage areas.

Starlink residential connection costs:

25-100 Mbits (maybe) = $120/month.  Note: This is 12X slower than Chattanooga's 300 Mbit option. And remember, Chattanooga also offers $30/month fiber to the poor, which is still faster than Starlink.

40-220 Mbits = $140-$500/month.   Note: This is 7.5X slower than Chattanooga, at a price that is 8.6X more expensive than Chattanooga. And remember those equipment costs. 

Starlink is so expensive that the poor can only afford it if charitable organizations give them corporate welfare, but if that funding dries up, their connections disappear—just like they did here during the pandemic. Even if we give Starlink corporate welfare, the connections are awful compared to fiber connections. This is corporate welfare at its worst.

Beyond all that, Starlink is an Environmental Nightmare

So what does this have to do with us? Here? Now? 

Remember County Executive Sidhu’s corporate welfare scheme to provide Starlink, via overpriced WAVE fiber, to the Nooksack Tribe? Remember that it crashed and burned at a loss of about $2 million that could have been used to start building the tribe a fiber network instead? Surely that experience taught us that Starlink is only a band-aid solution and ultimately too expensive to help the poor. And yet, they seem determined to try again. Did that $2,000,000 “lesson” not stick, or did our $2,000,000 go to WAVE/Starlink, right where it was supposed to go?

A few months ago, I wrote the article, “How to Get Nothing Done,” about the “fiber report” that was presented to Bellingham City Council as a “plan,” (in name only). Even council-member Lilliquist told the Interim Public Works Director that this terrible report was not a plan. Yet, the most recent information from the COB is that they are “still working” on a plan based on this deeply flawed document, and of course they are working on it behind closed doors with WAVE broadband, and big telecom is calling the shots.

The suspicion, based on past experience, is that they want to take the infrastructure we need—which should be a public fiber network, controlled by the people who paid for it, and installed under a county-wide Dig Once Policy—and they want to turn what should be ours, into corporate welfare instead.

In fact, they say their only goal is to “upgrade the COB network to a carrier class network” for their own use. Meaning we’ll be paying for the upgrade, and it will have lots of excess capacity, but they haven’t decided if they’re even going to give us access to it after the upgrade. The answer is probably not. 

In the 10 years I’ve been working on the fiber/broadband issue, I have learned that this is what they do. The establishment here, both Republicans and Corporate Democrats, stall ANY action for as long as possible, then present half-assed solutions as if they were new opportunities. These tried-and-true maneuvers successfully line the pockets of special interests with public funds. They did this many times during the pandemic, particularly with worthless wireless solutions. And they are about to do it again with Starlink. The cycle is about to repeat itself, which is, of course, their goal. 

Bolstered by a new FCC chair and backing from the incoming Trump administration, the local Democrats and Republicans who are invested in Starlink hope to fool us into giving corporate welfare to Elon Musk to pay him back for his campaign investments, I mean contributions. In a happy coincidence, this will also cause their stock to go up. So they plan to steal from us, via Starlink, plain and simple. And all they need is for us to be dumb enough, and complacent enough, to let it happen.  

The Solution: 

Based on the money we have given big telecom over the years, every home in America should have Gigabit fiber for $58/month or less. The best value to be had is a public fiber network installed as other repairs are made, which saves us 90% of the installation cost, and pays for itself via leasing and new business opportunities. Just like virtually all Americans have access to electricity thanks to the Rural Electrification Act, we must have a  Dig Once Policy to get it done. Fortunately, fiber is even easier to install. So the solution is what it always has been, is ridiculously easy, and we already have a roadmap to follow: We need to establish a public network with a Dig Once Policy. And it’s all been written down RIGHT HERE. 

Actions to Take:

Write to the City Council and mayor and demand that they establish a real plan as laid out in the aforementioned broadband strategies document. Demand that no matter what, if public funds are used on a public fiber network, then the public better have access to it.
You can do this easily by signing the fiber petition here and encouraging others to do so as well. 

About Jon Humphrey

Citizen Journalist • Bellingham • Member since May 23, 2017

Comments by Readers

David A. Swanson

Jan 05, 2025

In the interest of showing their dedication to mazimizing corporate benefits, the city and county councils  could team up with the Port to bring back ABC so that the cable and related scrap coming from all the homes forced to accept Starlink could be prepared for shipment to China.

Read More...

Tom Dohman

Jan 05, 2025

After signing the petition at the end of Jon’s article, I was besieged with donation requests via Change.org

Is there any way to donate to this Fiber Internet petition cause via a check payment, as I am very reluctant to use a CC for such payments?

Tom Dohman

Read More...

Richard Verbree

Jan 05, 2025

Like there is no carbon foot print to dig a trench for this holy grale fiber to each and every home in america…....if bill gates invented starlink, you would be singing its praises, but because of close minded partisan thought patterns, it’s musk bad because he supports teump, therefore starlink is bad, I hope you or one of your anti starlink friends doesn’t own a tesla, heaven forbid.

Quite a lot of one sided leftist propaganda on this nw citizen

Read More...

Richard Verbree

Jan 05, 2025

There are extremly cheap smart phone plans available to anyone for $25/month which provides all the connectivity needed to live a first world entitled life…...if one chooses to live in the middle of nowhere, one shouldn’t expect the government to provide you electricity or internet connection.

If you do live off the grid, solar panels and batteries….and yes an evil starlink, will connect you plenty good to video chat or stream things….GOOD ENOUGH!!!!!!

Read More...

John Servais

Jan 06, 2025

Richard, thanks for commenting.  Your thoughts are representative of many people I know who live in this area. And I do not think you are trolling.  So I want to address your points.  From the top.

There is no need to dig trenches for fiber cable to rural areas.  It goes on power poles just the same as telephone wires.  Low cost and no carbon foot print.  

Regards Bill Gates, I think very little of him as he basically stole things from others and sold things he did not own.  I think very highly of Elon Musk and have been a fan boy of him for many years.  He single handedly saved the U.S. space program.  With Tesla he has forced the world’s automakers to start building electic cars.  A best friend has a Tesla and we have enjoyed road trips in it.  An incredible vehicle and the safest car made in the world.  My son owns a Cybertruck and loves it.  I do think Musk has made a mess of Twitter - X - and his politics are for shit.  He is a South African immigrant who grew up with Apartheid and has a bigoted view of people and a huge entitlement concept about big white men like himself.

Starlink is a great program and is invaluable where fiber cable cannot go, and for ships, planes and many other special needs.   Like all new things, there are challenges with Starlink such as the reflections that hinder astronomers and the cost of having to constantly renew them. Where fiber cable can be strung to it is the superior solution in terms of cost, ease of use, speed, reliability and permanence.  

Smart phones do not work without celluar towers near by, so giving them to really rural residents is not a solution.  Just as getting electricity to rural areas was important in the 1930s, and getting phone service to rural areas was important afte WWII, so now it is important to get broadband Internet access via reliable fiber cable to rural areas.  Folks there should have the services that allow civilizd living just as much as we city folks.  For that, internet access is a necessity.  

As the founder of NW Citizen and now a co-owner, I am very appreciative of the articles Jon Humphrey has written for posting here.  In the drop down menu of ‘Citizen Journalists’ you can click his name and see the 85 articles by him - virtually all of them focused on public owned broadband access to the Internet via fiber cable for all residents of Whatcom County.  He is a valuable public voice in our community.

Read More...

Richard Verbree

Jan 07, 2025

John, 

I don’t know what trolling is, so you are right about that.

Tmobile has partnered with starlink to provide cell service to Tmobile customers via starlink satellites, so cell service is now available anywhere in america where you can see the sky.

Many homes are served by underground electricity only so new poles would need to be installed for some or a trench dug to be connected to fiber

Read More...

Richard Verbree

Jan 07, 2025

Electricity is provide by pse, a foreign owned monopoly, (owned by a toronto governememt employees pention fund), this is very bad for all who live here, pse gets green lit by utc 90% if the times they ask for a rate increase, all the while we do have a PUD in whatcom county that ironically does not provide or sell electricity to residents….only industry, very bad.

I’d love to hear why our publicly owned PUD does not provide electricity to the public?

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register

Corporate Welfare at its Worst …and About to Get Worse

By Jon HumphreyOn Jan 04, 2025

From Musk’s big investment all the way to local campaigns, political “contributions” will be re-paid. Here’s how.

7 comments, most recent 1 week ago

New Trump Administration Expected To Undo Biden’s Financial Regulation

By Guest WriterOn Nov 24, 2024

Chaos likely to ensue. Catastrophe cannot be ruled out.

15 comments, most recent 1 month ago

The Tyranny Of Leaf Blowers

By Guest WriterOn Nov 14, 2024

There is no escape from the deep-throated roar and the clouds of filth produced by these machines.

3 comments, most recent 1 month ago

Veterans Day, 2024.  What Is To Be Done?

By Dick ConoboyOn Nov 04, 2024

Deeds, not talk, count on Veterans Day

2 comments, most recent 2 months ago

How Do You Spell Budget And Disaster Relief?  N…I…B

By Dick ConoboyOn Oct 27, 2024

An off-budget $5 Trillion National Infrastructure Bank (NIB), along the lines of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) that operated between 1932-1957, means low-cost loans and no additions to the deficit.

An Overlooked Benefit of Improved Internet Access in Whatcom County: The U.S. Census

By David A. SwansonOn Oct 21, 2024

David Swanson verifies what Jon Humphrey has said for years: good internet access benefits people, cities, counties, and states.

10 comments, most recent 2 months ago

Minimum Wage - Farce or Tragedy?

By Dick ConoboyOn Oct 19, 2024

Or perhaps tragic farce or farcical tragedy might be more apt descriptors. Pick one, or both.

13 comments, most recent 2 months ago

How To Get Nothing Done

By Jon HumphreyOn Aug 24, 2024

The City has created another useless document ensuring nothing changes and mediocre communication services are protected.

13 comments, most recent 3 months ago

The Scrap Heap - The Real Message

By David Netboy On Jun 12, 2024

Aggressive citizen involvement carried the day.

5 comments, most recent 6 months ago

The Wealth Of Real Estate Corporations Is Not Our Purpose For Being

By Guest WriterOn Jun 11, 2024

Build-for-profit, incarceration-inspired housing is destroying our souls.

11 comments, most recent 3 months ago

All Remaining ABC Scrap Metal Is On Ship

By John ServaisOn Jun 10, 2024

The last of the scrap metal is loaded on the ship and it will be gone from our town.

1 comment, most recent 7 months ago

A Walking Tour at the Core of the Explosion

By John ServaisOn Jun 10, 2024

A 54-photo tour of the ruptured pipe area of the Whatcom Creek explosion taken in July 1999.

1 comment, most recent 7 months ago

The Audio of the Pipeline Explosion

By John ServaisOn Jun 08, 2024

Below is an audio tape of 911 calls, emergency responders’ radio communications, and local radio coverage from June 10, 1999 when Whatcom Creek exploded in Bellingham

2 comments, most recent 7 months ago

More Broadbandwashing and Anti-Voter Secrecy

By Jon HumphreyOn May 25, 2024

The foam of secrecy hides all.

Water Rights

By Tip JohnsonOn May 02, 2024

Local presentations scheduled on a reasonable use framework for water resource management

Moving Back from the Brink

By Gene MarxOn Apr 05, 2024

Pacific Northwest organizers join a global campaign to abolish all nukes and push for a city council resolution to start

4 comments, most recent 8 months ago

The $5 Trillion National Infrastructure Bank Is Looking Better Every Day

By Dick ConoboyOn Mar 27, 2024

With such a bank in place, we would likely not be scrambling around and asking Congress for rebuild monies, as we are now with the catastrophic event involving the Francis Scott Key bridge on March 26, 2024.

COB - Your Interests vs. Corporate Interests

By Jon HumphreyOn Mar 18, 2024

No public fiber means we can’t compete with big telecom. EVER.

4 comments, most recent 9 months ago

Three Wise Men?

By Tip JohnsonOn Jan 09, 2024

The Port Commission has decreed that Bellingham’s waterfront will remain a toxic, festering sore

6 comments, most recent 1 year ago

The ABC Recycling Hook

By David Netboy On Dec 26, 2023

We needed a hook, and we think we found it.

13 comments, most recent 11 months ago