Topic: Government (371)

Gabbard and Hegseth.  Why Are They Not Profoundly Ashamed?

To be so manifestly unqualified and yet not be deeply aware of that speaks exactly to the very point of not being qualified.

To be so manifestly unqualified and yet not be deeply aware of that speaks exactly to the very point of not being qualified.

By

The fact that Tulsi Gabbard and Pete Hegseth have accepted Trump's offer of appointment to the positions of Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and Secretary of Defense (SecDef) respectively, is a slap in the face to every member of the intelligence and military communities who ever served.  These nominees may look pretty and sound glib but their shallowness is apparent and dangerous.  

An apt analogy: Finish elementary school and then accept an appointment as a university president. 

Having spent 13 years as a commissioned officer on active duty in the Regular Army and several decades working intelligence in myriad capacities, the lack of experience of Gabbard and Hegspeth takes my breath away.  Their overinflated sense of having sufficient experience and knowledge flies in the face of my lived experience as an Army Infantry platoon leader to eventually work as a civilian at various times at the level of the Office of the Vice-president (National Partnership for Reinventing Government) , the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Defense POW/MIA Office - DPMO) , and the National Military Joint Intelligence Center within the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.   I would not feel remotely qualified to be either Director of National Intelligence (DNI) or Secretary of Defense (SecDef) even with my substantial work in the intelligence and military fields.  

Gen Clapper with the writer circa 1992

I actually knew a DNI, Air Force Lieutenant General James Clapper whose breadth of experience in the intelligence field was legendary.  Clapper was Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency at the time I knew him. He later retired from the Air Force and the DNI position,  regularly appearing then on cable news channels such as CNN as an expert in intelligence matters. This is the caliber of individual who should be sought for future DNIs.  Gabbard does not even come close. 

Although Gabbard served on several congressional committees relating to the military and foreign affairs during her time in the House (and to some very limited extent during her military service), such exposure is insufficient to have a grasp of the myriad aspects of intelligence let alone in sufficient detail to be able to direct or guide other agencies or assess intelligence products.  Knowledge and skills like that take years or decades to develop while working in the various intelligence agencies.  She doesn't know what she doesn't know; her decisions and assessments, were she to be approved, would bear the mark of that ignorance - half-assed results and outright errors.  And wait until she finds herself one-on-one with experienced, counterpart intelligence chiefs from other countries, MI6 of Britain, the DGSE of France or the Mossad of Israel .  Her ignorance will surface immediately and the other intelligence chiefs will eventually withhold classified information developed by their own nations for fear that in Gabbard's stupidity, deviousness or downright ignorance of her role that she may reveal that information to others and compromise their own extremely sensitive intelligence sources.  

That is the reason for having thorough background checks on any candidate for the Director of National Intelligence, one of the most sensitive posts in the U.S. Government. I am not talking about plans to have laughable background investigations by private firms as Trump desires.  To clear up issues having to do with Gabbard's foreign contacts, no matter the country, the Federal Bureau of Investigation must be involved.  During my career I had to undergo several “special” background checks that took four months or more to complete.  Every five years thereafter an additional background check was initiated   This was called a “bring up” to discover anything that may have arisen in the previous period.  Beyond that, polygraphs were required for continued work within special access programs.  Any DNI will have access to all of these programs and therefore should be thoroughly vetted, not only to insure suitability to work with intelligence information but also to insure that not only a president but also our allies are confident they are working with a DNI who can be trusted and not open to blackmail or other forms of coersion.  

As for Hegspeth, his 13 years of National Guard experience up to the rank of major confers precious little knowledge of the military at high echelons.  I will not disparage his service as an Infantry officer unless it becomes evident that he engaged in activities contrary to his oath of office as some recent reporting has suggested.  As mentioned above,  I also had 13 years of active duty service, including a tour in Vietnam (1968/69) as a HUMINT (intelligence derived from human sources) officer, before resigning as a major in the late 1970s.  However, I was able to work at echelons and gain experience well above that of a field grade infantry officer.  By the time I left the service I had held positions on the tripartite (US, French, British) Allied Staff, Berlin, in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence for the US Commander, Berlin, in a detachment of the then 500th Military Intelligence Group (Bangkok) and finally in the Intelligence and Security Command at Ft. Meade, MD. Hegseth's resume suggests nothing in the way of the broad experience necessary, outside the realm of the Infantry, that prepares a person for functioning at high levels of government. 

What is particularly abhorrent to me as a war veteran is Hegseth’s rejection of the Geneva Conventions on warfare and treatment of prisoners that are, as signed treaties, laws of the United States.  These despicable statements by Hegseth harken back to the likes of John Woo, John Ashcroft, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Robert Gonzales under then President Bush when they, for all intents and purposes, threw out these treaties to accommodate their torture/black sites program.  This treaty violation put our own military in danger of being treated in the same unconscionable manner while not enhancing our ability to obtain information through violent and illegal means. Without a doubt, Bush and his entourage committed war crimes. Now Hegseth is in agreement with them and thus promoting the commission of further war crimes.

Two Cultural Support Team members in Afghanistan - Those weapons are used.

Hegseth also wants women out of combat roles in the military.  Given the nature of warfare today, this is an impossibility.  60 years ago when I initially studied military science, the instruction was based on a WWII model with a front line (called the FEBA - Forward Edge of the Battle Area) which gave birth to the notion of a relatively safe “rear area” where exposure to hostile fire was minimal. Today that model is deader than the Dodo.  Even in Vietnam, there were no front lines.  I spent my last six months in My Tho, a small town in the Mekong Delta where I led an intelligence collection team in support of Riverine and 9th Infantry Division forces.  Mortar rounds landed near our quarters/office several times.  I was shot at while on the roof of our small building at midday.   Combat roles are now even murkier. Women are integrated at all levels in all the armed services and have proved themselves well in combat roles. Women are successfully completing the former “macho” courses like Ranger and Airborne [NB: Hegseth is neither Airborne nor Ranger qualified].  Hegseth is mourning a perceived loss of machismo in the ranks and therefore promoting a false notion that “girls” cannot or should not perform hazardous duties, including the combat arms. Believe me, “the girls” can… watch THIS, for example.  

In conclusion, I would like to add that dealing with senior military and civilian leaders in the intelligence community and in the Pentagon, or at the combatant command echelon in general, is to experience a totally different level of exactitude.  It is nothing like briefing or contributing during a meeting with  an infantry battalion commander or leadership of a National Guard unit.  My experience (based on giving briefings to Amb Paul Bremer, Gen Norman Schwartzkopf, Gen Creighton Abrams and several Directors of DIA to name a few) is that most senior leaders do not miss anything you say and remember everything you have said.  Their questions are quick to come and penetrating.  Woe be it to whomever tries to wing it.  You will not last long.  I do not see a great future for either Hegseth or Gabbard should these nominations go through.  They will be totally out of their element and the U.S will bear the consequences. 

"The Greeks of the classical period looked on the rulers of Persia or Egypt and their provincial imitators in the Greek world as at once, frivolous and dangerous because, in Greek Opinion, they were motivated not by the moral consensus of a responsible community but by the whims of what today we would call a collection of celebrities." *

The appointments of Hegseth and Gabbard fit well within this ancient Greek view of the world. They have been set in motion by a would-be ruler who lacks any understanding of a responsible community and like the would-be ruler, will represent the frivolous and dangerous whims of a collection of manifestly and massively unqualified celebrities.  Sadly, both Gabbard and Hegseth are “qualified” for the jobs Trump wants from them: to execute the mandates of the new Trumpian Reich.  

*From the review of the Iliad (by Homer), done by Kenneth Rexroth (p. 6 in Classics Revisited, New Directions Paperbacks, 1965)

About Dick Conoboy

Citizen Journalist and Editor • Member since Jan 26, 2008

Comments by Readers

M. Lynda Hanscome

Dec 01, 2024

Thank you, Dick, for explaining this in plain language.

God help us.

Read More...

Randy Petty

Dec 01, 2024

Theoretically the Senate could block these cabinet appointments 😊

Read More...

Michael Riordan

Dec 01, 2024

Yes, indeed, the Senate SHOULD block these appoinments, not “could,” but will they?

To me that’s the $64 billion dollar question today.

Read More...

Abe Jacobson

Dec 02, 2024

Thanks to Dick Conoboy for asking the “Duh!” obvious question, why are manifestly unqualified candidates for cabinet jobs not mortified with shame? Many commentators have lambasted Hegseth and Gabbard as unqualified, but to the best of my knowledge, only Conoboy has asked the most basic meta-question. 

Additionally, let’s look at would have been (in a normal world) a showstopper for Hegseth and Gabbard. That is, ability to have a security clearance. I had a Q clearance for 35 years of my career. Nobody with Hegseth’s drinking problem and behavioral issues, and nobody with Gabbard’s well documented entanglements with countries doing us harm, would have had a chance of a snowball in Hell of getting a security clearance back in the day of normalcy.

Thanks again Dick for saying the previously unsaid.

Read More...

Abe Jacobson

Dec 02, 2024

One further comment on Conoboy’s article: Read today’s online addition of Jane Mayer’s article in the New Yorker, detailing Hegseth’s sordid track record of managerial incompetence, drunkenness, and sexual harrassment (and allegedly worse) against women in his employ.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/pete-hegseths-secret-history

Read More...

Dick Conoboy

Dec 02, 2024

Thanks to Abe Jacobson for calling our attention to the recent article in the New Yorker magazine and therefore expanding the information available on Pete Hegseth.

I purposely did not go into any questionable/disqualifying background info on either of these two nominees.  My intent was to use the example of my experience as a point of comparison to demonstrate how shallow their Army experiences were.  They may have performed admirably but they certainly lack any appreciably extensive experience that would minimally support being qualified for becoming DNI or SecDef.

Unfortunately, should either or both of these individuals be confirmed to their appointments, the security clearance issue would very likely and quickly become moot as Trump has shown no reluctance in overriding the recommendations of government investigators and granting clearances to the most unsavory and disreputable of his entourage.  One’s mind turns immediately to the security issues surrounding Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, whose security clearance had to be granted by Trump after investigations showed his foreign contacts to be problematic, making him vulnerable to blackmail.

[NB: In the way of explanation, a Q Clearance is one given by the Department of Energy that is equivalent to Top Secret in other areas of the federal government and particularly  within the the Department of Defense.]

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register

Gabbard and Hegseth.  Why Are They Not Profoundly Ashamed?

By Dick ConoboyOn Dec 01, 2024

To be so manifestly unqualified and yet not be deeply aware of that speaks exactly to the very point of not being qualified.

6 comments, most recent 4 days ago

New Trump Administration Expected To Undo Biden’s Financial Regulation

By Guest WriterOn Nov 24, 2024

Chaos likely to ensue. Catastrophe cannot be ruled out.

15 comments, most recent 5 days ago

The Election of Donald Trump

By John ServaisOn Nov 07, 2024

A perspective from a very old liberal political junkie.

19 comments, most recent 1 week ago

Veterans Day, 2024.  What Is To Be Done?

By Dick ConoboyOn Nov 04, 2024

Deeds, not talk, count on Veterans Day

2 comments, most recent 3 weeks ago

VA Health Care for Life?  You Now May Be Eligible.

By Dick ConoboyOn Nov 01, 2024

Phasing in of Veterans Administration (VA) health care under the Pact Act has been eliminated. All eligible veterans can enroll in VA health care…NOW!

How Do You Spell Budget And Disaster Relief?  N…I…B

By Dick ConoboyOn Oct 27, 2024

An off-budget $5 Trillion National Infrastructure Bank (NIB), along the lines of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) that operated between 1932-1957, means low-cost loans and no additions to the deficit.

Medicare Advantage Open Season And YOU Are The $$$ Target

By Dick ConoboyOn Oct 23, 2024

Medicare Advantage is NOT Medicare. Medicare is there to provide health care. Medicare Advantage is a business, there to make money.

1 comment, most recent 1 month ago

An Overlooked Benefit of Improved Internet Access in Whatcom County: The U.S. Census

By David A. SwansonOn Oct 21, 2024

David Swanson verifies what Jon Humphrey has said for years: good internet access benefits people, cities, counties, and states.

10 comments, most recent 1 month ago

Minimum Wage - Farce or Tragedy?

By Dick ConoboyOn Oct 19, 2024

Or perhaps tragic farce or farcical tragedy might be more apt descriptors. Pick one, or both.

13 comments, most recent 1 month ago

The Disturbing Disappearance of Local Banks

By Guest WriterOn Sep 19, 2024

The top 20% of commercial banks in the United States control 95% of our total banking assets. Remember “Too-Big-to-Fail”?

3 comments, most recent 2 months ago

How To Get Nothing Done

By Jon HumphreyOn Aug 24, 2024

The City has created another useless document ensuring nothing changes and mediocre communication services are protected.

13 comments, most recent 2 months ago

First Murray. Now Larsen. Half Trillion Dollar Theft From Medicare: Not An Issue.

By Dick ConoboyOn Jul 27, 2024

Heaven forbid our reps should attack the main problem, Medicare Advantage, head on. But no. They must nibble around the edges to give the appearance of doing something.

1 comment, most recent 4 months ago

Moral Injury Links Medicare Advantage Physicians To Combat Veterans

By Dick ConoboyOn Jun 16, 2024

Morally significant double binds force doctors and combat soldiers into identical life and death quandaries, damaging their moral centers. To these two groups we can also add law enforcement officers.

4 comments, most recent 5 months ago

Over A Half Trillion Dollars Stolen From Medicare - Sen. Patty Murray Is OK With That

By Dick ConoboyOn Jun 14, 2024

It is time to stop the “Real Steal” from Medicare.

3 comments, most recent 5 months ago

The Scrap Heap - The Real Message

By David Netboy On Jun 12, 2024

Aggressive citizen involvement carried the day.

5 comments, most recent 5 months ago

Memorial Day 2024 - Remembering My Friends

By Dick ConoboyOn May 25, 2024

If not killed-in-action, they are still dying from the effects of their service in Vietnam.

7 comments, most recent 6 months ago

More Broadbandwashing and Anti-Voter Secrecy

By Jon HumphreyOn May 25, 2024

The foam of secrecy hides all.

Water Rights

By Tip JohnsonOn May 02, 2024

Local presentations scheduled on a reasonable use framework for water resource management

Moving Back from the Brink

By Gene MarxOn Apr 05, 2024

Pacific Northwest organizers join a global campaign to abolish all nukes and push for a city council resolution to start

4 comments, most recent 7 months ago

Medicare (Dis)Advantage - Even Hospitals Don’t Like It.

By Dick ConoboyOn Mar 31, 2024

If the hospitals are smelling a rat, so should Medicare (Dis)Advantage victims (AKA enrollees).

2 comments, most recent 5 months ago